4.5 Article

Growth-driven displacement of protein aggregates along the cell length ensures partitioning to both daughter cells in Caulobacter crescentus

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 6, 页码 1430-1448

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14228

关键词

-

资金

  1. LOEWE program of the state Hessen
  2. Strategic Research Areas (SFO) from Stockholm University
  3. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research [FFL15-0005]
  4. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  5. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) [FFL15-0005] Funding Source: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All living cells must cope with protein aggregation, which occurs as a result of experiencing stress. In previously studied bacteria, aggregated protein is collected at the cell poles and is retained throughout consecutive cell divisions only in old pole-inheriting daughter cells, resulting in aggregation-free progeny within a few generations. In this study, we describe the in vivo kinetics of aggregate formation and elimination following heat and antibiotic stress in the asymmetrically dividing bacterium Caulobacter crescentus. Unexpectedly, in this bacterium, protein aggregates form as multiple distributed foci located throughout the cell volume. Time-lapse microscopy revealed that under moderate stress, the majority of these protein aggregates are short-lived and rapidly dissolved by the major chaperone DnaK and the disaggregase ClpB. Severe stress or genetic perturbation of the protein quality control machinery induces the formation of long-lived aggregates. Importantly, the majority of persistent aggregates neither collect at the cell poles nor are they partitioned to only one daughter cell type. Instead, we show that aggregates are distributed to both daughter cells in the same ratio at each division, which is driven by the continuous elongation of the growing mother cell. Therefore, our study has revealed a new pattern of protein aggregate inheritance in bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据