4.5 Article

Identification and characterization of species-specific nanobodies for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 493, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.09.023

关键词

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); Listeria monocytogenes; Naive library; Phage display; Variable domain of heavy-chain antibodies (VHHs)

资金

  1. Program of State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology [SKLF-ZZA-201302, SKLF-ZZB-201306]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271863, 31301479]
  3. Educational Commission of Jiangxi Province [GJJ12142, GJJ13574]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20114BAB205039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Listeria monocytogenes (LM), one of the eight species belonging to the genus Listeria, is pathogenic for both humans and animals. In this study, two novel LM-specific clones, designated L5-78 and L5-79, were isolated from a phage display antibody library that was derived from the variable domain of heavy-chain antibodies (VHHs) of non-immunized alpaca. These two clones were expressed, purified, and characterized. Results showed that both isolated VHHs recognize three serotypes (1/2a, 1/2b, and 4b), which are responsible for more than 95% of documented human listeriosis cases. The recombinant VHHs possess high thermal stability, pH tolerance, and urea resistance. A sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on the VHH clone L5-79 and a monoclonal antibody was developed to detect LM in pasteurized milk, with a detection limit of 1 x 10(4) colony-forming units (CFU)/ml. These findings indicated that the species-specific VHHs could be directly isolated from the non-immunized library with a properly designed panning strategy and VHH could be a new source for possible diagnosis/detection of foodborne pathogens in food because it was shown to be highly specific and stable. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据