4.5 Review

Clinical efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease stage IV: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 98, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014604

关键词

ACE inhibitors; angiotensin receptor blockers; diabetic kidney disease; randomized controlled trials; Tripterygium wilfordii Hook

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [H0517/81560132]
  2. Supporting Project for the Foregoers of Main Disciplines of Jiangxi Province [20162BCB22023]
  3. 5511 Innovative Drivers for Talent Teams of Jiangxi Province [20165BCB18018]
  4. Nature Science Foundation of JiangXi Province [20181BAB205016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background:The present study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook (TwH) combined with angiotensin receptor blockers/ACE inhibitors (ARB/ACEI) in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) stage IV.Methods:We searched China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), the Chinese Biomedical Database, Embase and PubMed for articles about TwH combined with ARB/ACEI in treating DKD stage IV and set the study inclusion and elimination standards.Results:A total of 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1414 participants were collected for detailed evaluation. The meta-analysis results suggested that compared with the controls, the combined group showed significant effects in reducing 24-h urinary protein [mean difference (MD) = -0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (-1.03, -0.71)], raising serum albumin [MD = 4.14, 95% CI (3.43, 4.85)] and the total efficiency [odds ratio (OR) = 4.84, 95% CI (3.33, 7.03)], with no statistical difference in serum creatinine between both groups [MD = -3.02, 95% CI (-6.40, 0.37), P>.05]. However, the risk of adverse reactions increased by 8% [Risk Difference (RD) = 0.08, 95% CI (0.05, 0.11)] in the combination.Conclusions:TwH combined with ARB/ACEI in the treatment of DKD stage IV is superior to the monotherapy of ARB/ACEI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据