4.7 Article

Rapid analysis of cocaine and metabolites in urine using microextraction in packed sorbent and GC/MS

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 409, 期 8, 页码 2051-2063

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-0152-2

关键词

Cocaine and metabolites; MEPS; Urine; GC-MS

资金

  1. FEDER funds through the POCI-COMPETE-Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalisation in Axis I-Strengthening research, technological development and innovation [POCI-010145-FEDER-007491]
  2. National Funds by FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/Multi/00709/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cocaine is still one of the most abused drugs worldwide and, as such, it is often screened for in driving-under-the-influence or workplace drug - testing scenarios. A large number of samples have usually to be processed in those situations, and this requires fast and simple extraction procedures for the detection and quantification of the drugs. The present work describes an ultrafast and fully validated procedure for the simultaneous detection and quantification of cocaine and its two main metabolites, ecgonine methyl ester and benzoylecgonine, in urine using microextraction by packed sorbent and GC-MS. A small sample volume (200 mu L) was used, and a fast extraction procedure together with a microwave-assisted derivatization (800 W, 2 min) allowed the quantification of all analytes in a range of 25 to 1000 ng/mL (r (2) > 0.99). Inter-day precision revealed coefficients of variation (CVs) lower than 10% for all analytes at the tested concentration levels, with an accuracy within a +/- 7% interval, with the exception of EME's lowest calibrator (+/- 17%). Intra-day CVs were lower than 15% at the studied concentration levels, with a mean relative error within a +/- 13% interval. Recoveries ranged from 14.5 to 37.2% (EME), 67.0 to 83.3% (cocaine), and 24.6 to 43.5% (BEG), allowing the limits of detection and quantification to be set at 25 ng/mL for all compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据