4.7 Article

Passivity guaranteed stiffness control with multiple frequency band specifications for a cable-driven series elastic actuator

期刊

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 709-722

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.007

关键词

Human-robot interaction; Series elastic actuator; Stiffness control; Passivity; Frequency-domain specifications

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61720106012]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Robotics [2016-003]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impedance control and specifically stiffness control are widely applied for physical human robot interaction. The series elastic actuator (SEA) provides inherent compliance, safety and further benefits. This paper aims to improve the stiffness control performance of a cable-driven SEA. Existing impedance controllers were designed within the full frequency domain, though human-robot interaction commonly falls in the low frequency range. We enhance the stiffness rendering performance under formulated constrains of passivity, actuator limitation, disturbance attenuation, noise rejection at their specific frequency ranges. Firstly, we reformulate this multiple frequency-band optimization problem into the He., synthesis framework. Then, the performance goals are quantitatively characterized by respective restricted frequency-domain specifications as norm bounds. Further, a structured controller is directly synthesized to satisfy all the competing performance requirements. Both simulation and experimental results showed that the produced controller enabled good interaction performance for each desired stiffness varying from 0 to 1 times of the physical spring constant. Compared with the passivity-based PID method, the proposed H-infinity synthesis method achieved more accurate and robust stiffness control performance with guaranteed passivity. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据