4.7 Article

Determination of type A trichothecenes in coix seed by magnetic solid-phase extraction based on magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes coupled with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 408, 期 24, 页码 6823-6831

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-9809-0

关键词

Magnetic solid-phase extraction; Magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; Type A trichothecenes; Coix seed

资金

  1. Shanghai Agriculture Commission Project [3-2, 6-3-2]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan Project [15142201500]
  3. Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences Zhu Pao Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic solid-phase extraction (m-SPE) is a promising sample preparation approach due to its convenience, speed, and simplicity. For the first time, a rapid and reliable m-SPE approach using magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (m-MWCNTs) as the adsorbent was proposed for purification of type A trichothecenes including T-2 toxins (T2), HT-2 toxins (HT-2), diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), and neosolaniol (NEO) in coix seed. The m-MWCNTs were synthesized by assembling the magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4) with MWCNTs by sonication through an aggregation wrap mechanism, and characterized by transmission electron microscope. Several key parameters affecting the performance of the procedure were extensively investigated including extraction solutions, desorption solvents, and m-MWCNT amounts. Under the optimal sample preparation conditions followed by analysis with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS), high sensitivity (limit of quantification in the range of 0.3-1.5 mu g kg(-1)), good linearity (R (2) > 0.99), satisfactory recovery (73.6-90.6 %), and acceptable precision (aecurrency sign2.5 %) were obtained. The analytical performance of the developed method has also been successfully evaluated in real coix seed samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据