4.7 Article

A probabilistic Kitagawa-Takahashi diagram for fatigue strength assessment of cast aluminium alloys

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.108

关键词

Aluminium cast; Fatigue strength; Defects; Kitagawa-Takahashi diagram; Tensile tests; Probability; Hot isostatic pressing

资金

  1. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
  2. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminium cast components containing intrinsic flaws were investigated in terms of fatigue strength. Therefore, quasi-static, fracture mechanical and fatigue tests were conducted at specimens exhibiting varying microstructural characteristics. Subsequently, the specimens were metallographically and fractographically analysed to evaluate spatial extent of the fracture initiating defects as well as the statistical distribution of defect sizes. Furthermore, the near defect-free fatigue strength was investigated to evaluate the upper boundary in fatigue strength for the Kitagawa-Takahashi diagram. In addition, the fracture mechanical test results were statistically evaluated as probabilistic values. Further on, a probabilistic evaluation of the crack resistance curve-concept was set up, taking the statistically distributed long crack threshold into account. The fatigue tests were finally utilized as probabilistic, defect correlated, fatigue design approach. The experimental results revealed that the fracture elongation of HIPped material increases by an average of 146% and the fatigue strength elevates of about 35%. The evaluated parameters from extensive crack propagation tests propose a long crack threshold of approximately 4 MPa root m and an intrinsic threshold of slightly beneath 1 MPa root m. The probabilistic Chapetti and El Haddad approaches lead to a sound correspondence with the experimental test data. Therefore, the presented fatigue assessment scientifically supports the lightweight design process especially for utmost probabilities of survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据