4.7 Article

Effects of shot peening parameters on gradient microstructure and mechanical properties of TRC AZ31

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 9-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.12.001

关键词

Gradient structure; Severe shot peening; Strengthening mechanism; Annealing; Ultra-fine grains; TRC AZ31

资金

  1. Battelle - PNNL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microstructural variation along the depth of twin-roll cast sheet AZ31 Mg alloy was achieved by applying severe plastic deformation via intensified shot peening on the surface of the work-piece. Mechanical incompatibility between different layers from the ultra-fine crystallized structure on the peened surface to the un-deformed layers on the specimen interior introduces enhanced mechanical properties. AZ31 has shown distinct sensitivities to various parameters of the shot peening procedure such as pressure, shot size, and processing time. Thus, shot peening with shot sizes from less than 0.4 mm (conventional) to 3.18 mm for different processing times and under various pressures were performed to characterize their roles in controlling the microstructure and mechanical properties. Microstructural analysis revealed a direct relation between the thickness of the ultra-fine grained layer and severe shot peening parameters whereas each of them has a distinct effect on grain size. Electron backscatter diffraction data were used to define three distinct deformed layers wherein grain size and texture were changed during the process. Furthermore, microhardness tests demonstrated how pressure and shot size control fine grains at the surface. Tensile test results revealed that the best mechanical properties were obtained by maximum shot size and pressure at minimum processing time. Adding post-annealing treatment to the severely shot peened specimens enhanced ductility without a noticeable loss of ultimate strength. Consequently, this process has improved strength and ductility simultaneously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据