4.7 Article

Screen-printed electrode modified with carbon black and chitosan: a novel platform for acetylcholinesterase biosensor development

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 408, 期 26, 页码 7299-7309

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-9604-y

关键词

Acetylcholinesterase biosensor; Carbon black; Chitosan; Pesticides; Amperometric detection; Paraoxon

资金

  1. EU Ocean Project [SMS FP7-OCEAN-2013, 613844]
  2. International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) grant under the Marie Curie Actions program Peptide Nanosensors [N 29490]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a screen-printed electrode (SPE) modified with a dispersion of carbon black (CB) and chitosan by drop casting. A cyclic voltammetry technique towards ferricyanide, caffeic acid, hydroquinone, and thiocholine was performed and an improvement of the electrochemical response with respect to bare SPE as well as SPE modified only with chitosan was observed. The possibility to detect thiocholine at a low applied potential with high sensitivity was exploited and an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) biosensor was developed. A dispersion of CB, chitosan, and AChE was used to fabricate this biosensor in one step by drop casting. The enzymatic activity of the immobilized AChE was determined measuring the enzymatic product thiocholine at +300 mV. Owing to the capability of organophosphorus pesticides to inhibit AChE, this biosensor was used to detect these pollutants, and paraoxon was taken as model compound. The enzyme inhibition was linearly related to the concentration of paraoxon up to 0.5 mu g L-1, and a low detection limit equal to 0.05 mu g L-1 (calculated as 10% of inhibition) was achieved. This biosensor was challenged for paraoxon detection in drinking waters with satisfactory recovery values. The use of AChE embedded in a dispersion of CB and chitosan allowed an easy and fast production of a sensitive biosensor suitable for paraoxon detection in drinking waters at legal limit levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据