4.7 Review

Evaluating Efficacy of Antimicrobial and Antifouling Materials for Urinary Tract Medical Devices: Challenges and Recommendations

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800384

关键词

antimicrobial; device-associated urinary tract infections; in vitro; in vivo; material testing

资金

  1. EU-funded Trans Domain COST Action [TD 1305 iPROMEDAI]
  2. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)
  3. Portuguese Government, Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/BTM-SAL/29335/2017]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BTM-SAL/29335/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Europe, the mean incidence of urinary tract infections in intensive care units is 1.1 per 1000 patient-days. Of these cases, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) account for 98%. In total, CAUTI in hospitals is estimated to give additional health-care costs of 1-2.5 pound billion in the United Kingdom alone. This is in sharp contrast to the low cost of urinary catheters and emphasizes the need for innovative products that reduce the incidence rate of CAUTI. Ureteral stents and other urinary-tract devices suffer similar problems. Antimicrobial strategies are being developed, however, the evaluation of their efficacy is very challenging. This review aims to provide considerations and recommendations covering all relevant aspects of antimicrobial material testing, including surface characterization, biocompatibility, cytotoxicity, in vitro and in vivo tests, microbial strain selection, and hydrodynamic conditions, all in the perspective of complying to the complex pathology of device-associated urinary tract infection. The recommendations should be on the basis of standard assays to be developed which would enable comparisons of results obtained in different research labs both in industry and in academia, as well as provide industry and academia with tools to assess the antimicrobial properties for urinary tract devices in a reliable way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据