4.7 Article

Components and antibacterial activity of a novel essential oil from the nutrient broth of Eremothecium ashbyii H4565

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 389-394

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.037

关键词

E. ashbyii H4565; Essential oil; Antibacterial activities; Antibacterial mechanism

资金

  1. Huanggang Normal University, China [0411203]
  2. outstanding young and middle-aged scientific and technological innovation team of Colleges and universities in Hubei Province, China [T201820]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food spoilage is a global issue, and millions of people suffer from food-borne infections. So it is urgent to search for novel, effective and safe antimicrobial agents. A novel essential oil was obtained from Eremothecium ashbyii H4565, which was identified and conserved in the China Center for Type Culture Collection. The chemical components of the essential oil were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results showed that 22 components were identified, and the major compounds were geraniol, citronellol, phenylethyl alcohol, longifolene, linalool and nerolidol. By disc diffusion assay and double-broth dilution method, the essential oil exhibited antibacterial activities against food spoilage microbes, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Zygosaccharomyces bailii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Candida utilis. The minimum inhibition concentrations of the essential oil against these microorganisms were 15.6, 15.6, 15.6, 15.6, 7.8, 7.8, 31.2, 15.6, and 31.2 mu g/mL, respectively. Based on the results of electron microscopy, protein and DNA leakage, and cytoplasmic membrane permeability, the possible antibacterial mechanism was indicated that cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane were destroyed as the targets by the essential oil. Therefore, it was suggested that essential oil might be used as a potential antimicrobial agent in food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据