4.7 Article

Fast evaluation by quantitative PCR of microbial diversity and safety of Chinese Paocai inoculated with Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116 as the culture starter

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 201-206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.001

关键词

Fast detection; Lactic acid bacteria; Pathogens; Nitrite; Safety

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0400705-2]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Major Program of Research and Development Foundation [20165ABC28004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paocai as a traditional side dish in Asia gains its popularity owing to the favorable tastes, which are bestowed by microbial metabolisms. The microorganisms involved in fermentation are mainly lactic acid bacteria and Saccharomyces, while low-quality Paocai may contain spoilage and potentially pathogenic microorganisms such as Escherichia coll. To monitor and control food safety for direct vat inoculation of Paocai, this study intended to develop propidium monoazide based quantitative PCR to enumerate fermentation starter Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116, as well as Saccharomyces and potentially present pathogenic bacteria. Universal and specific primers targeting different microorganisms were designed to identify and quantify total lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus plantarum, Saccharomyces, and Escherichia coil by establishment of standard curves, respectively. Plate counting was performed and showed comparable results to quantitative PCR analysis, indicating the applicability and efficiency of absolute quantitative PCR in fast detection of microbial composition in Paocai system. Nitrite as a hazardous substance in Paocai was also investigated by spectrophotometry and reverse transcription quantitative PCR. The mechanism of nitrite synthesis and degradation was studied, revealing nitrite reductase in lactic acid bacteria as an effective enzyme in reducing nitrite present in the fermented vegetable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据