4.7 Article

Effects of alginate-glycerol-citric acid concentrations on selected physical, mechanical, and barrier properties of papaya puree-based edible films and coatings, as evaluated by response surface methodology

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 83-91

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.005

关键词

Papaya puree; Edible film; Edible coating; Sodium alginate; Physicochemical properties

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
  2. Program for Professional Development of Teachers (PRODEP) of the Mexican Ministry of Public Education
  3. Autonomous University of Carmen
  4. Universidad de las Americas Puebla

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of edible coatings is an interesting strategy to reduce the use of conventional packaging materials and extend the shelf life of minimally processed fruits. The potential of papaya puree (PP) as a base for formulating edible films and coatings containing alginate (0.5-1.0 g/100 mL), glycerol (0.8-1.5 g/100 mL), and citric acid (0.5-1.0 g/100 mL) was evaluated. A Box-Behnken experimental design was used to determine the effect of independent variables on selected physical and mechanical properties, water vapor permeability (WVP) of PP edible films (PPEFs), and the surface solid density (SSD) and water vapor resistance of PP coating solutions (PPCSs) applied to papaya cubes. Furthermore, the PPEFs and PPCSs were optimized and validated using response surface models. Alginate-citric acid and glycerol-citric acid interactions significantly affected the SSD. The highest puncture strength of PPEFs was 17.94 MPa, with the highest concentration of alginate, whereas the WVP increased with higher concentrations of glycerol and citric acid. The optimum concentrations of alginate, glycerol, and citric acid for PPCSs and PPEFs were predicted to be 0.50, 1.32, and 0.59 g/100 mL, and 0.78, 0.80, and 0.50 g/100 mL, respectively. The mean average relative percent deviations between the experimental and predicted values were less than 10%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据