4.5 Article

Outcomes of Carotid-Sparing IMRT for T1 Glottic Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Radiation

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 130, 期 1, 页码 146-153

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.27873

关键词

IMRT; radiation therapy; T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma; larynx cancer; oncologic outcomes

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) [1R01DE025248-01, R56DE025248-01]
  2. NIH/National Cancer Institute (NCI) Early Phase Clinical Trials in Imaging and Image-Guided Interventions Program [1R01CA218148-01]
  3. NIH/NCI Head and Neck Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) Developmental Research Program Award [P50CA097007-10]
  4. Paul Calabresi Clinical Oncology Program Award [K12 CA088084-06]
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Mathematical Sciences, Joint NIH/NSF Initiative on Quantitative Approaches to Biomedical Big Data (QuBBD) [NSF 1557679]
  6. NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) Program of the NCI Early Stage Development of Technologies in Biomedical Computing, Informatics, and Big Data Science Award [1R01CA214825-01]
  7. Cancer Center Support Grant Radiation Oncology/Cancer Imaging Program [5P30CA016672]
  8. Elekta AB
  9. NIH/NCI [5R0CA148707-03, 5R01CA160880-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: We aim to report oncologic outcomes after conventional radiotherapy (ConRT) using opposed lateral beams and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for tumor (T)1 nodal (N)0 T1 N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma. Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics for patients treated at our institution during 2000 to 2013. Results: One hundred fifty-three patients (71%) were treated using ConRT and 62 (29%) using IMRT. The median follow-up for all patients was 68 months. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year local control between patients with T1a versus T1b disease (94% vs. 89%, respectively, P = 0.5). Three-year locoregional control for patients treated with ConRT was 94% compared to 97% with IMRT (P = 0.4). Three-year overall survival (OS) for patients treated with ConRT was 92.5% compared with 100% with IMRT (P = 0.1). Twelve of 14 patients with local recurrence underwent salvage surgery with 5-year ultimate locoregional control of 98.5% and 97.1% in the ConRT and IMRT cohorts, respectively (P = 0.7). Multivariate analysis showed age < 60 years (P < 0.0001) and pretreatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <2 (P = 0.0022) to be independent correlates of improved OS. Postradiation cerebrovascular events were in four patients in the ConRT cohort (3%), whereas no patients in the IMRT cohort suffered any events. Conclusion: Because the oncologic outcomes for patients treated with IMRT were excellent and IMRT allows for carotid sparing, we have transitioned to IMRT as our standard for most patients with T1 glottic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据