4.7 Article

Characterizing the catastrophic 2017 Mud Creek landslide, California, using repeat structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry

期刊

LANDSLIDES
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 1201-1219

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01160-4

关键词

Landslide; Big Sur; California; Structure-from-motion photogrammetry

资金

  1. Coastal and Marine Geology Program under the USGS Natural Hazards Mission Area
  2. Landslides Hazards Program under the USGS Natural Hazards Mission Area

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Along the rugged coast of Big Sur, California, the Mud Creek landslide failed catastrophically on May 20, 2017, and destroyed over 400m of scenic California State Highway 1. We collected structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry data using airborne platforms that, when combined with existing airborne lidar data, revealed that the area exhibited significant topographic change and displacement before, during, and after the catastrophic failure. Before the catastrophic failure, we document two areas of elevated change in the zone of depletion, which aligned with the double-peaked head scarp produced by the catastrophic failure. The catastrophic failure extended from 337-m elevation to at least 8m below sea level, was 490m wide, displaced similar to 3 million m(3) of earth and rock, and deposited landslide debris at least 175m seaward of the original shoreline. The failure was not a complete slope-clearing event, however, and several upslope and lateral regions that did not slip into the ocean exhibited significant displacement and topographic change during the days and months after the catastrophic failure. Additionally, we use the post-slide data to quantify several other processes, including the time-varying rates of talus accumulation and coastal erosion of the landslide toe. We conclude that repeat SfM surveys from aerial imagery can provide valuable information about landslide evolution and the potential for deep-seated landslide hazardsespecially in the lead up to catastrophic failureif photos are collected and processed regularly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据