4.7 Article

UPLC-MS/MS detection of disaccharides derived from glycosaminoglycans as biomarkers of mucopolysaccharidoses

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 936, 期 -, 页码 139-148

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.06.054

关键词

Mucopolysaccharidoses; Tandem mass spectrometry; Glycosaminoglycans; Dermatan sulfate; Heparan sulfate; Keratan sulfate; Chondroitin sulfate

资金

  1. Shire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) are a group of disorders resulting from primary defects in lysosomal enzymes involved in the degradation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Depending on the specific enzyme defect, the catabolism of one or more GAGs is blocked leading to accumulation in tissues and biological fluids. GAG measurements are important for high-risk screening, diagnosis, monitoring treatment efficacy, and patient follow up. The dimethylmethylene blue (DMB) spectrophotometric method commonly used in most biochemical genetics laboratories relies on a non-specific total GAG analysis which has led to false positive results, and even false negative results (mainly for MPS III and IV patients). The main objective of our project was to devise and validate a reliable tandem mass spectrometry multiplex analysis for the urine quantitation of four GAGs (dermatan sulfate (DS), heparan sulfate (HS), keratan sulfate (KS), and chondroitin sulfate (CS)) for an eventual technological transfer to the clinic. The developed methodology is rapid (7 min) and our results showed good intraday and interday precision (RSDs <= 8.7%) and accuracy (Biases range: -12.0%-18.4%). Linearity was good (r(2) > 0.995) for DS, HS, CS, and KS calibration curves. In comparison with the DMB spectrophotometric method, this multiplex tandem mass spectrometry method allows GAG fractionation, thus a differentiation of MPS types, except for MPS I and II which are characterized by the same GAG profile. The devised method is a useful and reliable tool for diagnosis of MPS patients, as well as their monitoring and follow up, as shown by longitudinal studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据