4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Ethylene glycol assisted preparation of Ti4+-modified polydopamine coated magnetic particles with rough surface for capture of phosphorylated proteins

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 929, 期 -, 页码 23-30

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.04.058

关键词

Ti4+-rPDA@Fe3O4 particles; Separation; Immobilized metal ion affinity; chromatography; Phosphorylated proteins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reversible protein phosphorylation is very important in regulating almost all aspects of cell life, while the enrichment of phosphorylated proteins still remains a technical challenge. In this work, polydopamine (PDA) modified magnetic particles with rough surface (rPDA@Fe3O4) were synthesized by introduction of ethylene glycol in aqueous solution. The PDA coating possessing a wealth of catechol hydroxyl groups could serve as an active medium to immobilize titanium ions through the metalcatechol chelation, which makes the fabrication of titanium ions modified rPDA@Fe3O4 particles (Ti4+-rPDA@Fe3O4) simple and very convenient. The spherical Ti4+-rPDA@Fe3O4 particles have a surface area of 37.7 m(2) g(-1) and superparamagnetism with a saturation magnetization value of 38.4 emu g(-1). The amount of Ti element in the particle was measured to be 3.93%. And the particles demonstrated good water dispersibility. The particles were used as adsorbents for capture of phosphorylated proteins and they demonstrated affinity and specificity for phosphorylated proteins due to the specific binding sites (Ti4+). Factors affecting the adsorption of phosphorylated proteins on Ti4+-rPDA@Fe3O4 particles were investigated. The adsorption capacity of Ti4+-rPDA@Fe3O4 particles for k-casein was 1105.6 mg g(-1). Furthermore, the particles were successfully applied to isolate phosphorylated proteins in milk samples, which demonstrated that Ti4+-rPDA@Fe3O4 particles had potential application in selective separation of phosphorylated proteins. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据