4.6 Article

Association of Muscle Mass with Survival after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 202, 期 3, 页码 525-530

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000249

关键词

prostatic neoplasms; survival analysis; body composition; prostatectomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Although muscle mass has been associated with survival in patients with various types of solid tumors, the relationship between muscle mass and survival in patients with prostate cancer remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated the association of muscle mass with survival after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 2,042 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy of prostate cancer between 1998 and 2013. Muscle mass was evaluated by measuring the psoas muscle index on preoperative computerized tomography images. Results: In the lowest, second, third and highest psoas muscle index quartiles the 10-year distant metastasis-free survival rate was 72.5%, 83.8%, 92.3% and 93.7% (p < 0.001), the 10-year cancer specific survival rate was 85.7%, 92.1%, 96.8% and 97.6%, and the 10-year overall survival rate was 74.5%, 79.6%, 89.8% and 90.6%, respectively (each p < 0.001). The psoas muscle index positively correlated with the body mass index, serum concentrations of IGFBP-3 and bioavailable testosterone, and inversely correlated with patient age, the serum SHBG concentration and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. On multivariable analysis the psoas muscle index was independently associated with increased risks of biochemical recurrence, distant metastasis, and cancer specific and overall death. Conclusions: Low muscle mass may be associated with increased risks of recurrence and mortality in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy of prostate cancer regardless of the body mass index. Large-scale prospective studies are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据