4.7 Article

Thermal oxidation process and characteristic of abietic acid and gum rosin by accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC)

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 138, 期 1, 页码 479-488

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-019-08195-8

关键词

Gum rosin; Abietic acid; Oxidation reaction; Kinetics; Accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11762003]
  2. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Fellowship of Japan
  3. Major Science and Technology Special Project in Guangxi [AA17204065-20]
  4. Science Foundation of Guangxi University for Nationalities of China [2017MDQN004, XTCX201706]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative characteristic of abietic acid and rosin was investigated using an accelerating rate calorimeter, and initial oxidation temperature was calculated by temperature-time (T-t) and pressure-time (P-t) plot. The result showed that the exothermic reaction does not occur when heating to 523.15 K under nitrogen atmosphere. Under oxygen atmosphere, characteristic of oxidation reaction process was found: first abietic acid or rosin absorbed oxygen, and then an exothermic oxidation reaction has occurred. The initial exothermic temperature (T-0) of abietic acid and rosin oxidation reaction are 308.9 K and 308.92 K, respectively. The kinetics of abietic acid (or rosin) is a second-order reaction in initial oxidation reaction. The linear equation of abietic acid is Y=-43169(1/T)+11.83, and activation energy (E-a) is 35.88 kJ mol(-1) at T=309.50-339.44 K. The linear equation of rosin is Y=-7111.79(1/T)+21.43, and activation energy (E-a) is 59.13 kJ mol(-1) at T=309.52-331.31 K. The peroxides of primary oxidation product were analyzed by iodimetry, abietic acid and rosin peroxide concentration are 78.79 mg kg(-1) and 56.96 mg kg(-1), respectively, when oxidation reaction time is 8 h at 313.15 K. Therefore, oxidation reaction is easy to occur at lower temperature even at 303.15 K by iodimetry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据