4.4 Article

Mechanical characterization and asymptotic homogenization of 3D-printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-019-1630-1

关键词

3D printing of composite materials; Continuous carbon fiber; Experimental characterization; Asymptotic homogenization

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001, CAPES-PROEX 88882.180843/2018-01]
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2015/00159-5]
  3. Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnologicas do Estado de Sao Paulo SA - IPT
  4. Fundacao de Apoio ao Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnologicas do Estado de Sao Paulo - FIPT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work investigates the mechanical properties of continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic by testing composite specimens which were manufactured using an innovative process based on the fused filament fabrication (FFF, analogous to FDM (R)). The adopted testing procedures and their results are presented, as well as an introduction to the manufacturing process, which is patented by Markforged Inc. The experimental mechanical properties (stiffness and strength) of the composite specimens, measured in tensile (longitudinal and transverse), compression (longitudinal) and in-plane shear are reported. The asymptotic homogenization technique is applied in order to predict the elastic mechanical properties of the carbon fiber-reinforced lamina. In contrast to recent studies, this investigation has revealed that considering Nylon as the thermoplastic matrix embedding the continuous fiber consistently underpredicts the transverse and in-plane shear elastic properties of the reinforced laminae. These results suggest that the composition of the thermoplastic resin is not exactly the same for the unreinforced and reinforced filaments. Additionally, cross-sectional micrographs of specimens are analyzed in detail and considerable insight has been gained concerning the thermoplastic resin of reinforced filaments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据