期刊
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 115, 期 529, 页码 163-172出版社
AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1529598
关键词
Bias; Confounding; Meta-analysis; Observational studies; Sensitivity analysis
资金
- National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship [32 CFR 168a, ES017876]
Random-effects meta-analyses of observational studies can produce biased estimates if the synthesized studies are subject to unmeasured confounding. We propose sensitivity analyses quantifying the extent to which unmeasured confounding of specified magnitude could reduce to below a certain threshold the proportion of true effect sizes that are scientifically meaningful. We also develop converse methods to estimate the strength of confounding capable of reducing the proportion of scientifically meaningful true effects to below a chosen threshold. These methods apply when a bias factor is assumed to be normally distributed across studies or is assessed across a range of fixed values. Our estimators are derived using recently proposed sharp bounds on confounding bias within a single study that do not make assumptions regarding the unmeasured confounders themselves or the functional form of their relationships with the exposure and outcome of interest. We provide an R package, EValue, and a free website that compute point estimates and inference and produce plots for conducting such sensitivity analyses. These methods facilitate principled use of random-effects meta-analyses of observational studies to assess the strength of causal evidence for a hypothesis. for this article are available online.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据