4.5 Article

Abnormal Spontaneous Regional Brain Activity in Young Patients With Anorexia Nervosa Abnormal Spontaneous Regional Brain Activity in Young Patients With Anorexia Nervosa

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.01.011

关键词

anorexia nervosa; resting state; regional homogeneity; amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF)

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EH 367/51, EH 367/7-1, SFB 940]
  2. Swiss Anorexia Nervosa Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have repeatedly shown alterations in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). These alterations might be driven by baseline signal characteristics such as the (fractional) amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (fALFF/ALFF), as well as regional signal consistency (ie, regional homogeneity [ReHo]) within circumscribed brain regions. Previous studies have also demonstrated gray matter (pseudo-) atrophy in underweight individuals with AN. Here we study fALFF/ALFF and ReHo in predominantly adolescent patients with AN, while taking gray matter changes into consideration. Method: Resting state fMRI data were acquired from a sample of 148 female volunteers: 74 underweight patients with AN and 74 age-matched female healthy controls (HC). Results: Group differences for fALFF and ReHo measures were found in several AN-relevant brain regions, including networks related to cognitive control, habit formation, and the ventral visual stream. Furthermore, the magnitude of correlation between gray matter volume/thickness and fALFF and ReHo were reduced in AN compared to HC. Conclusion: Abnormal local resting state characteristics in AN-related brain-networks as well as reduced structure-function relationships may help to explain previously reported task-related and classical resting state neural alterations in underweight AN. Patients with AN may serve as a valuable population for investigating dynamic changes in the relationships between brain structure and function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据