4.2 Article

Health-Related Quality of Life and Fatigue After Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.09.046

关键词

Health-related quality of life; fatigue; cognitive impairment; TIA; minor stroke; stroke outcome measures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Studies suggest that fatigue and cognitive impairment may be present after transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke, but little is known about consequences in daily life. The main aim was to explore the presence of fatigue, cognitive impairment, and consequences in daily life after minor stroke-TIA. Methods: Patients (n = 92) were consecutively recruited from the Stroke Unit and were assessed within 2 weeks of hospital admission for first-ever and 3 months later. Control participants (n = 89) were recruited from the same population as the patients. Measures included the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and The European Quality of Life index (EQ-5D-5L). Results: The prevalence of substantial fatigue was 65.2% (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 54.6%-74.8%) and extreme fatigue was 20.7% (CI 95%: 12.9%-30.4%) in minor stroke-TIA patients. The prevalence of substantial fatigue in controls was 23.5% (CI95%: 15.0%-34.0%) and extreme fatigue was 4.5% (CI 95%: 1.8%-11.0%). The mean (SD) score on the MoCA was 24.1 (3.2) for the patients group and 27.3 (2.4) for controls (P < .001). FAS showed the strongest negative correlation score with the EQ-5D-5L index (r = -0.480; P < .0001), higher levels of mental and physical fatigue are associated with lower EQ-5D-5L index (r = -0.376; P < .001 and r = -0.497; P <.001, respectively). The correlations between the FAS and the MoCA measures were no significant. MoCA was not significantly correlated with EQ-5D-5L. Conclusions: Fatigue was a very common symptom in TIA/minor stroke patients. The fatigue had a significant impact on the health-related quality of life construct in its entirety, even after accounting for the influence of several factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据