4.5 Article

Understanding Nonadherence with Hydroxychloroquine Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 10, 页码 1309-1315

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180946

关键词

HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE; SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a cornerstone to managing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), yet adherence to medication is poor. We sought to measure the association of adherence with 5 dimensions of adherence as articulated by the World Health Organization for chronic conditions: the patient's socioeconomic status, and patient-, condition-, therapy-, and healthcare system-related factors. Our longterm goal is to generate evidence to design effective interventions to increase adherence. Methods. The retrospective cohort study included Kaiser Permanente Northern California patients >= 18 years old during 2006-2014, with SLE and >= 2 consecutive prescriptions for HCQ. Adherence was calculated from the medication possession ratio and dichotomized as < 80% versus >= 80%. Predictor variables were obtained from the electronic medical record and census data. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate adjusted OR and 95% CI. Results. The study included 1956 patients. Only 58% of patients had adherence >= 80%. In adjusted analyses, socioeconomic variables did not predict adherence. Increasing age (65-89 yrs compared with <= 39 yrs: OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07-1.93), white race (p < 0.05), and the number of rheumatology visits in the year before baseline (>= 3 compared with 0 or 1: OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.18-1.83) were positively associated with adherence. The rheumatologist and medical center providing care were not associated with adherence. Conclusion. At our setting, as in other settings, about half of patients with SLE were not adherent to HCQ therapy. Differences in adherence by race/ethnicity suggest the possibility of using tailored interventions to increase adherence. Qualitative research is needed to elucidate patient preferences for adherence support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据