4.8 Article

High performance printable perovskite solar cells based on Cs0.1FA0.9PbI3 in mesoporous scaffolds

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 415, 期 -, 页码 105-111

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.065

关键词

Perovskite solar cells; Mesoporous scaffold; FAPbI(3); Phase transition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502141, 91433203, 61474049, 21702069]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015AA034601]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province [2017AAA190]
  5. 111 Project [B07038]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612452]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI(3)) has been investigated as the recent most exciting light absorber materials for photovoltaics. Printable perovskite solar cells based on MAPbI(3) in a TiO2/ZrO2/Carbon triple-layer mesoporous scaffold have shown simple fabrication process and impressive stability. Moving towards formamidinium lead triiodide (FAPbI(3)) as the light absorber, which has a bandgap of 1.48 eV that matches the optimum bandgap (1.34 eV) of a single-junction solar cell, will result in further improvement in power conversion efficiency. However, it is challenging to deposit high-quality FAPbI(3 )in a 10-mu m-thick mesoporous scaffold due to the incomplete one-step conversion of perovskite precursors restrained in the mesoporous scaffold. Here we report printable perovskite solar cells with high-quality Cs(0.1)FA(0.9)PbI(3) absorber inside mesoporous scaffolds using a mixed solvent vapor assisted crystallization approach. A power conversion efficiency of 15% is obtained with a spectral response up to 840 nm. The phase transition and crystal growth of Cs(0.1)FAPbI(3) are carefully monitored in the mesoporous scaffold. This work not only opens up new methods for fabricating efficient and stable solar cells but also provides a deeper understanding of crystal growth inside constrained nanostructures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据