4.6 Article

Flow-Induced Transport via Optical Heating of a Single Gold Nanoparticle

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 123, 期 7, 页码 4512-4522

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11575

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17K05005]
  2. Nichia-Scholarship from the University of Tokushima
  3. Elekiteru-Ozaki Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K05005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optothermal trapping has gained increasing popularity in manipulation such as selecting, guiding, and positioning submicron objects because of a few mW laser power much lower than that required for optical trapping. Optothermal trapping uses thermal-gradient-induced phoretic motions, but the underlying physics of driving force has not been fully understood. In this study, we performed optothermal trapping of 500 nm-diameter colloidal silica via a continuous laser illumination of a single gold nanoparticle from the bottom in a closed chamber. Under illumination, the tracer particles were attracted to the gold nanoparticle and trapped. Notably, the direction of migrating particles was always to hot gold nanoparticles regardless of the configuration of gold nanoparticles placed at two opposite sides of the chamber, on the bottom surface of an upper substrate (ceiling) or on the top surface of a lower substrate (floor). The previous interpretation based on thermal convective flow from the bottom to the top and circulating inside the chamber was only applicable to floor configuration and failed to explain our observation for the ceiling. Instead, temperature-induced Marangoni effect at the water/superheated water interface is likely to play a role. This study promoted a better understanding of the driving mechanism in optothermal trapping. Moreover, as an application of the single-particle platform, we showed the photothermal phase separation-induced microdroplet formation of thermoresponsive polymers and the coating of non-thermoresponsive polymers on nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据