4.5 Article

The Diverse Nature of Ion Speciation at the Nanoscale Hydrophobic/Water Interface

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 123, 期 10, 页码 2414-2423

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b10207

关键词

-

资金

  1. Julia Jacobi Foundation
  2. European Research Council [616305]
  3. US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences
  4. Materials Synthesis and Simulation Across Scales (MS3) Initiative through the Laboratory Research and Development Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  5. Office of Science of the US DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many biological systems are composed of nanoscale structures having hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups adjacent to one another and in contact with aqueous electrolyte solution. The interaction of ions with such structures is of fundamental importance. Although many studies have focused on characterizing planar extended (often air/water) interfaces, little is known about ion speciation at complex nanoscale biological systems. To start understanding the complex mechanisms involved, we use a hexadecane nanodroplet system, stabilized with a dilute monolayer of positively charged dodecyltrimethylammonium cations (DTA(+)) groups in contact with an electrolyte solution (NaSCN). Using vibrational sum frequency scattering, second harmonic scattering, zeta-potential measurements, and quantum density functional theory, we find DTA(+)-SCN- ion pairing at concentrations as low as 5 mM. A variety of ion species emerge at different ionic strengths, with differently oriented SCN- groups adsorbed on hydrophilic or hydrophobic parts of the surface. This diverse and heterogeneous chemical environment is surprisingly different from the behavior at extended liquid planar interfaces, where ion pairing is typically detected at molar concentrations and nanoscale system stability is no requirement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据