4.6 Article

Catalysts in electro-, photo- and photoelectrocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.02.002

关键词

CO2 reduction; Catalyst; Electrocatalysis; Photocatalysis; Photoelectrocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673117, 21703104]
  2. Jiangsu Science and Technology Plan [S131Q017041514]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Foundation for Specially Appointed Professor, Nanjing Tech University [39837102, 39837131]
  4. SICAM Fellowship from Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CBET 1703662, 1703655]
  6. American Chemical Society (ACS) (Petroleum Research Fund (PRF)) [59820-ND5]
  7. Directorate For Engineering
  8. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1703655] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is regarded as a main contributor to the greenhouse effect. As a potential strategy to mitigate its negative impacts, the reduction of CO2 is environmentally critical, economically meaningful and scientifically challenging. Being both thermodynamically and kinetically unfavored, CO2 reduction requires catalysts as a crucial component irrespective of the reaction modes, be it electrocatalytic, photoelectrocatalytic or photocatalytic. In an effort to systematically review the types of catalysts that have been studied for CO2 reduction, we categorize them into two major groups: those being activated by external sources and those being photoexcited and activated themselves. Attention is focused on the detailed mechanisms for each group by which the reduction of CO2 proceeds, yielding a summary of the guiding principles for catalyst designs. This review highlights the importance of mechanistic studies, which permits us to discuss our perspectives on potential directions of catalyst investigation for future catalytic CO2 reduction research. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据