4.6 Article

Ciprofloxacin degradation in UV/chlorine advanced oxidation process: Influencing factors, mechanisms and degradation pathways

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.10.043

关键词

Ciprofloxacin; UV/chlorine process; Advance oxidation process; Reactive species; UV photolysis; Wastewater

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578205, 51538012, 51728801]
  2. Project of Science and Technology in Anhui Province [1501041130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is a widely used third generation fluoroquinolone antibiotics, and has been often detected in wastewater treatment plants. Finding an effective way to remove them from wastewater is of great concern. Ultraviolet (UV)/chlorine advanced oxidation process (AOP) has many advantages in micropollutant removal. In this study, CIP degradation in UV/chlorine process was investigated. Only 41.2% of CIP was degraded by UV photolysis and 30.5% by dark chlorination in 30 min, while 98.5% of CIP was degraded by UV/chlorine process in 9 min. HCO3- had markedly inhibition, NO3- and SO42- had slight inhibition, and Cl- had a marginal inhibition on CIP degradation in UV/chlorine system. The degradation of CIP in UV/chlorine process was mainly attributed to the attack of reactive species. The relative contributions of hydrated electrons (e(aq)(center dot)), hydroxyl radicals (HO center dot), chlorine atoms (Cl-center dot), and UV photolysis were investigated. Under neutral condition in aqueous solution, CIP degradation had highest pseudo first-order reaction rate constant, in which e(aq)(center dot) had the highest contribution, followed by Cl-center dot, HO center dot, and UV photolysis. The intermediates and byproducts were identified and the degradation pathway was proposed. The total organic chlorine (TOCl) and biotoxicity were further assessed. CIP and natural organic matters (NOMs) were removed efficiently in real water. UV/chlorine showed the potential for the wastewater treatment containing CIP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据