4.6 Article

Risk Factors for Complications in Children with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 214-+

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Training [T32 GM-075766]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To determine risk factors for complications in children with Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus) bacteremia, including methicillin resistance. Study design Single center, retrospective cohort study of children <= 18 years of age hospitalized with S aureus bacteremia. We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between those with methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Multivariate regression models identified risk factors associated with developing complications and with longer duration of bacteremia. Results We identified 394 episodes of S aureus bacteremia, 279 (70.8%) with MSSA, and 115 (29.2%) with MRSA. Primary site of infection was catheter-related in 34%, musculoskeletal in 30%, skin/soft tissue in 10.2%, pneumonia in 6.4%, and endovascular in 6.6%. Eight children (2.0%) died within 30 days because of S aureus bacteremia, 15 (3.5%) had recurrence within 30 days, and 38 (9.6%) had complications including septic emboli or a metastatic focus of infection. Methicillin resistance was associated with development of a complication (aOR 3.31; 95% CI 1.60-6.85), and catheter-related infections were less likely to be associated with a complication (aOR 0.40; 95% CI 0.15-1.03). In a Poisson regression analysis on duration of bacteremia, methicillin resistance, musculoskeletal infection, endovascular infection, black race, and delayed intervention for source control were significantly associated with longer duration of bacteremia. Conclusions In this cohort of children with S aureus bacteremia, MRSA infections ere associated with longer duration of bacteremia and a higher likelihood of complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据