4.7 Article

An Essential Role of the Intraparietal Sulcus in Response Inhibition Predicted by Parcellation-Based Network

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 39, 期 13, 页码 2509-2521

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2244-18.2019

关键词

cortical parcellation; executive function; posterior parietal cortex; response inhibition; transcranial magnetic stimulation

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [16K18367, 18K07348, 16K16076]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K07348, 16K18367, 16K16076] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) features close anatomical and functional relationships with the prefrontal cortex. However, the necessity of the PPC in executive functions has been questioned. The present study used the stop-signal task to examine response inhibition, an executive function that inhibits prepotent response tendency. The brain activity and resting-state functional connectivity were measured to analyze a parcellation-based network that was aimed at identifying a candidate PPC region essential for response inhibition in humans. The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) was activated during response inhibition and connected with the inferior frontal cortex and the presupplementary motor area, the two frontal regions known to be necessary for response inhibition. Next, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to test the essential role of the IPS region for response inhibition. TMS over the IPS region prolonged the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), the standard behavioral index used to evaluate stopping performance, when stimulation was applied 30-0 ms before stopping. On the contrary, stimulation over the temporoparietal junction region, an area activated during response inhibition but lacking connectivity with the two frontal regions, did not show changes in SSRT. These results indicate that the IPS identified using the parcellation-based network plays an essential role in executive functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据