4.7 Article

Interleukin-10 inhibits interleukin-1β production and inflammasome activation of microglia in epileptic seizures

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12974-019-1452-1

关键词

Epilepsy; Microglia; IL-10; IL-1 beta

资金

  1. Guangdong Science and Technology Department [2015A030310047]
  2. Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Molecular Mechanism and Translational Medicine of Guangzhou Bureau of Science and Information Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Microglia are important for secreting chemical mediators of inflammatory responses in the central nervous system. Interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-1 beta secreted by glial cells support neuronal functions, but the related mechanisms remain vague. Our goal was to demonstrate the efficacy of IL-10 in suppressing IL-1 beta and in inflammasome activation in mice with epileptic seizure based on an epileptic-seizure mouse model. Methods: In this study, mice in which epileptic seizures were induced by administering picrotoxin (PTX) were used as a case group, and mice injected with saline were employed as the control group. The expression of nucleic acids, cytokines, or signaling pathways was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), flow cytometry, and Western blotting. Results: Our results demonstrated that IL-10 inhibits IL-1 beta production through two distinct mechanisms: (1) Treatment with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) results in IL-10 overexpression in microglia and reduced NLRP3 inflammasome activity, thus inhibiting caspase-1-related IL-1 beta maturation; (2) next, autocrine IL-10 was found to subsequently promote signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT-3), reducing amounts of pro-IL-1 beta. Conclusions: Our results indicate that IL-10 is potentially effective in the treatment of inflammation encephalopathy, and suggest the potential usefulness of IL-10 for treating autoimmune or inflammatory ailments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据