4.5 Article

Incidence and clinicopathologic features of H3 K27M mutations in adults with radiographically-determined midline gliomas

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 87-93

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03134-x

关键词

Diffuse midline glioma; Glioma; H3 K27M; IDH1

资金

  1. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center [P30CA006973]
  2. Keep Punching Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeH3 K27 mutations, most commonly in H3F3A, are common in diffuse midline glioma. The exact frequency of these mutations in adults with gliomas in the midline location is unknown. This study was conducted to define the incidence of H3 K27M mutations in this location and to compare clinicopathological features with those of patients who do not harbor this mutation.MethodsConsecutive glioma cases from 2007 to 2017 were screened for gliomas in the midline location. Immunohistochemistry was performed on all available tissue for mutations of H3 K27M, IDH1, and ARTX.ResultsOf 850 gliomas screened, 163 cases had midline glioma on MRI. Sufficient FFPE tissue was available for 123 cases (75%). H3 K27M mutation was identified in 18 of 123 cases (15%). All except one H3 K27M-mutant tumors were WHO grade III or IV on histology, while non-mutant tumors encompassed all four grades. The most common midline locations for H3 K27M-mutated tumors were midbrain (2/3; 67%), pons (4/11; 36%), and cerebellum (6/24; 25%). As compared to H3 K27M-wildtype tumors, there were no differences in age at diagnosis, sex, tumor grade, contrast enhancement on MRI, extent of resection, or treatment received. In this cohort, median survival was longer for patients with H3 K27M-mutated tumors (n=18;17.6months) compared with high-grade wildtype tumors (n=74; 7.7months, p=0.03).ConclusionsH3 K27M mutations are common in midline gliomas in adults and can present in all midline locations. Survival comparison between H3 K27M-mutant and wildtype midline gliomas suggests that survival may be similar or possibly improved if the mutation is present.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据