4.7 Article

Interaction of salicylic acid analogues with Pluronic® micelles: Investigations on micellar growth and morphological transition

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 563-570

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.12.142

关键词

Pluronics; Small angle neutron scattering; Salicylic acid analogues; Micelles; Morphological transition

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India [SB/FT/CS-080/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aqueous solutions of PEO-PPO-PEO type triblock copolymers (Pluronic P123, P103 and P105) with variations in their total molecular weight and block contribution are investigated for encapsulation of drugs. Two drugs, namely Aspirin (AS) and 5-Methyl Salicylate (MS) having different partition coefficient was studied. The changes in size and micellar dynamics due to formation of drug-polymer complexes are investigated using dynamic light scattering (DLS), dynamic surface tension (DST), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) measurements. Increase in apparent hydrodynamic diameter (D-h) measured by DLS suggests the growth of micelles, which is equally supported by calculated micellar parameters from SANS measurements. The solubilization of drugs within micelles alters the diffusivity of the monomers due to stronger hydrophobic forces leading to highly stable aggregates as concluded by dynamic surface tension measurements. The significant increase in micellar size was noticed in presence of MS, while AS had less prominent effect on micellar growth. The preferential partitioning of drug into the hydrophobic micellar core is the driving force for the possible formation of higher morphologies. The hydrophobic interactions between MS and P123 are confirmed by H-1 NMR. The differences in molecular interactions leading to distinct morphological behavior are explained by the localization of drug within nanocarriers. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据