4.2 Article

Relation between pregestational obesity and characteristics of the placenta

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 20, 页码 3425-3430

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1573222

关键词

Maternal obesity; placental maturity; placental morphology; placental pathology; placental weight

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective:To evaluate the morphology of the placenta in patients with pregestational overweight (OW), pregestational obesity (PGOB), or normal weight. Methods:A cross-sectional study including women (n = 114) >= 20 years of age with a singleton pregnancy was carried out. The groups were integrated according to pregestational body mass index (BMI): 51 patients had a normal BMI (18.5-24.99 kg/m(2)), 30 were overweight (25-29.99 kg/m(2)), and 33 women were obese (>= 30.0 kg/m(2)). A morphometric study of the placenta was performed and the placental maturity index (PMI) was calculated according to the formula: PMI = number of vasculo-syncytial membranes (VSM) in 1 mm(2)/VSM thickness. In the histopathological study, the presence of infarcts, calcifications, hemorrhage, thrombosis, fibrosis, cysts, and edema was determined. Results:The weight and length of newborns at birth were greater in the group with PGOB (p < .01). We observed a lower number of VSM (29 +/- 9 versus 39 +/- 13 and 34 +/- 11) and a greater thickness (1.05 +/- 0.24 versus 0.95 +/- 0.08 and 0.89 +/- 0.09) and, therefore, a lower PMI (29.75 +/- 12.63 versus 40.88 +/- 15.25 and 39.28 +/- 14.4) in the group of women with PGOB compared with the group of women with OW or normal weight (p < .01). The histopathological analyses showed a greater frequency of edema and cysts in the PGOB group. Conclusion:PGOB is associated with a higher placental weight and newborn weight, a lower PMI, and the presence of histopathological alterations. The preceding points highlight the importance of promoting an appropriate pregestational weight in women of reproductive age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据