4.7 Article

A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial Shows the Role of Zonal Priming and Direct Topical Application of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate in the Modulation of Cutaneous Scarring in Human Skin

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 139, 期 8, 页码 1680-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.01.030

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR Manchester BRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a polyphenol, influences cutaneous wound healing because of its antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. We previously showed the role of EGCG in scarring in ex vivo human scar models. Here, we evaluate direct application of topical EGCG compared with zonal priming, a unique concept in the immediate treatment of the zone of injury at the time of wounding before scar formation. Trial design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. Methods: We assessed EGCG application compared with placebo over 1-6 weeks in scars created in 62 human volunteers using quantitative noninvasive devices, immunohistochemical analysis, mRNA sequencing, and quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR of tissue biopsy samples. Results: EGCG reduced mast cells at weeks 1-3, as evidenced by gene and protein analyses (P <= 0.01). M2 macrophages were increased with EGCG compared with placebo. EGCG application by zonal priming significantly down-regulated VEGFA and CD31 at week 1 and at 1-2 weeks after direct application (P <= 0.01). Direct EGCG application also reduced scar thickness at weeks 1-3 (P = 0.001) and increased scar elasticity at week 4 (P = 0.01). Increased hydration was evident both noninvasively and by increased hyaluronic acid levels (P < 0.01) at week 3. Conclusions: We show the beneficial role of both zonal priming and direct EGCG application in scar therapy with positive effects on scar thickness, erythema, hydration, and elasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据