4.7 Review

Exploring the molecular basis of heterosis for plant breeding

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 287-298

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12804

关键词

-

资金

  1. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2017-01-07-00-02-E00039] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31825015] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [18DZ2260500] Funding Source: Medline
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100902] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Plant Germplasm Resources [17DZ2252700] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [18XD1402900] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since approximate a century ago, many hybrid crops have been continually developed by crossing two inbred varieties. Owing to heterosis (hybrid vigor) in plants, these hybrids often have superior agricultural performances in yield or disease resistance succeeding their inbred parental lines. Several classical hypotheses have been proposed to explain the genetic causes of heterosis. During recent years, many new genetics and genomics strategies have been developed and used for the identifications of heterotic genes in plants. Heterotic effects of the heterotic loci and molecular functions of the heterotic genes are being investigated in many plants such as rice, maize, sorghum, Arabidopsis and tomato. More and more data and knowledge coming from the molecular studies of heterotic loci and genes will serve as a valuable resource for hybrid breeding by molecular design in future. This review aims to address recent advances in our understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms of heterosis in plants. The remaining scientific questions on the molecular basis of heterosis and the potential applications in breeding are also proposed and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据