4.2 Article

Effect of peripheral blood mononuclear cell cryopreservation on innate and adaptive immune responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 465, 期 -, 页码 61-66

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.11.006

关键词

Cryopreservation; Toll-like receptor; Peripheral blood mononuclear cell; Cytokines; Adaptive immunity; Innate immunity

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cryopreservation of blood-derived immune cells is commonly used in clinical trials to examine immunological responses. However, studies elucidating the effects of cryopreservation on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) responses have shown inconsistent results making it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions. Therefore we sought to address this issue by comparing key innate and adaptive immune parameters between freshly-isolated and cryopreserved PBMCs from healthy adults. We examined the effect of cryopreservation on the expression of key markers on innate and adaptive immune cell populations (i.e. CD4+ and CD8+ [T cells], CD14+ [monocytes], CD19+ [B cells], CD56+ [NK cells] or CD19 + CD27 + [memory B cells]), on cytokine secretion (TNF-alpha, INF-gamma, IL-1 beta, IL-10, IL-6, MCP-1 and RANTES) in cultured PBMC supernatants following stimulation with a range of Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, as well as on antigen-specific memory B cell enumeration by ELISpot. We found that cryopreservation had no effect on the expression of immune markers on innate and adaptive immune cells as well on the number of antigen-specific memory B cells. However, the response to TLR ligands such as FLA-ST, CpG and LPS was variable with increased cytokine production by cryopreserved PBMCs observed compared to freshly-isolated PBMCs. Our results suggest that the effect of cryopreservation on the biological response of immune cell populations needs to be carefully considered, particularly in the context of clinical studies that rely on these immune outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据