4.7 Article

Influence of pigments on phototransformation of biocides in paints

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 364, 期 -, 页码 125-133

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.018

关键词

Off; Terbutryn; Indirect photolysis; Construction materials

资金

  1. Miljostyrelsen (Danish EPA) through the project: Transport and transformation of biocides in construction materials - Factors controlling release and emissions (TransBio) [MST-667-00178, MST-667-000179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biocides are commonly applied to construction materials such as facade renders and paints in order to protect them from microbial spoilage. These renders and paints are exposed to weathering conditions, e.g., sunlight and rain. Pigments are interacting intensively with the spectrum of the incoming light; thus, an effect of paint pigments on phototransformation rates and reaction pathways of the biocides is hypothesized. In this study, the phototransformation of four commonly used biocides (carbendazim, diuron, octylisothiazolinone (OFF) and terbutryn) in four different paint formulations differing solely in pigments (red and black iron oxides, white titanium dioxide, and one pigment-free formulation) were investigated. Paints surfaces were irradiated under controlled conditions. The results show that biocides degrade most rapidly in the pigment-free formulation. The degradation in the pigment-free formulation followed a first-order kinetic model with the respective photolysis rate constants: k(p,Dioron) = 0.0090 h(-1), k(p,OIT) = 0.1205 h(-1), k(p,Terbutryn) = 0.0079 h(-1). Carbendazim concentrations did not change significantly. The degradation was considerably lower in the pigment-containing paints. The determination of several phototransformation products of terbutryn and octylisothiazolinone showed different transformation product ratios dependent on the pigment. Consequently, pigments not only reflect the incoming light, but also interact with the biocide photodegradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据