期刊
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 326-333出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1098
关键词
autonomy; children; ethics; genetic counseling; guidelines; incidental findings; secondary findings
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommendations for reporting of incidental (now secondary) findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing (Green et al., Genet Med 15:565, 2013) is an often cited and sometimes misapplied professional guideline. To best approach the current state of secondary findings (SFs) in genomic medicine, and consider their impact, it is helpful to understand how and why the guideline was created. Of particular importance is the context - the state of the science and clinical practice during 2011-2012 when the guideline were initially developed. This paper will review the setting before the guidelines were published, and empiric research and discussion that has occurred since.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据