4.7 Article

C4-like photosynthesis and the effects of leaf senescence on C4-like physiology in Sesuvium sesuvioides (Aizoaceae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 70, 期 5, 页码 1553-1565

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz011

关键词

Aizoaceae; carbon isotope values; C-4-like; C-4 photosynthesis; immunolocalization of Rubisco and PEPC; portulacelloid leaf anatomy

资金

  1. Sybille Kalkhof-Rose Foundation
  2. German Science Foundation [KA1816-7-1]
  3. PhD funding programme of the Carl-Zeiss Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sesuvium sesuvioides (Sesuvioideae, Aizoaceae) is a perennial, salt-tolerant herb distributed in flats, depressions, or disturbed habitats of southern Africa and the Cape Verdes. Based on carbon isotope values, it is considered a C-4 species, despite a relatively high ratio of mesophyll to bundle sheath cells (2.7:1) in the portulacelloid leaf anatomy. Using leaf anatomy, immunocytochemistry, gas exchange measurements, and enzyme activity assays, we sought to identify the biochemical subtype of C-4 photosynthesis used by S. sesuvioides and to explore the anatomical, physiological, and biochemical traits of young, mature, and senescing leaves, with the aim to elucidate the plasticity and possible limitations of the photosynthetic efficiency in this species. Assays indicated that S. sesuvioides employs the NADP-malic enzyme as the major decarboxylating enzyme. The activity of C-4 enzymes, however, declined as leaves aged, and the proportion of water storage tissue increased while air space decreased. These changes suggest a functional shift from photosynthesis to water storage in older leaves. Interestingly, S. sesuvioides demonstrated CO2 compensation points ranging between C-4 and C-3-C-4 intermediate values, and immunocytochemistry revealed labeling of the Rubisco large subunit in mesophyll cells. We hypothesize that S. sesuvioides represents a young C-4 lineage with C-4-like photosynthesis in which C-3 and C-4 cycles are running simultaneously in the mesophyll.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据