4.7 Article

TaBT1, affecting starch synthesis and thousand kernel weight, underwent strong selection during wheat improvement

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 70, 期 5, 页码 1497-1511

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz032

关键词

Haplotype; molecular marker; selection; starch synthesis; TaBT1; thousand kernel weight (TKW); wheat

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471492]
  3. International Cooperation Program of Ministry of Agriculture [2016-X16]
  4. CAAS-Innovation Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BRITTLE1 (BT1), responsible for unidirectional transmembrane transport of ADP-glucose, plays a pivotal role in starch synthesis of cereal grain. In this study, we isolated three TaBT1 homoeologous genes located on chromosomes 6A, 6B, and 6D in common wheat. TaBT1 was mainly expressed in developing grains, and knockdown of TaBT1 in common wheat produced a decrease in grain size, thousand kernel weight (TKW), and grain total starch content. High diversity was detected at the TaBT1-6B locus, with 24 polymorphic sites forming three haplotypes (Hap1, Hap2, and Hap3). Association analysis revealed that Hap1 and Hap2 were preferred haplotypes in modern breeding, for their significant correlations with higher TKW. Furthermore, -glucuronidase (GUS) staining and enzyme activity assays in developing grains of transgenic rice with exogenous promoters indicated that the promoters of Hap1 and Hap2 showed stronger driving activity than that of Hap3. Evolutionary analysis revealed that BT1 underwent strong selection during wheat polyploidization. In addition, the frequency distribution of TaBT1-6B haplotypes revealed that Hap1 and Hap2 were preferred in global modern wheat cultivars. Our findings suggest that TaBT1 has an important effect on starch synthesis and TKW, and provide two valuable molecular markers for marker assisted selection (MAS) in wheat high-yield breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据