4.5 Article

Atopic dermatitis disease registry in Japanese adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (ADDRESS-J): Baseline characteristics, treatment history and disease burden

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 290-300

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.14787

关键词

adult; atopic dermatitis; burden of disease; Japan; registry

资金

  1. Sanofi
  2. Sanofi Genzyme
  3. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  4. UMIN-CTR [UMIN000022623]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has a high disease burden and a significant effect on quality of life. Observational studies are necessary to determine the patient disease burden and long-term disease control in the Japanese population. ADDRESS-J is a non-interventional, observational registry of adult Japanese patients with moderate to severe AD. Herein, we report baseline data from the ADDRESS-J study describing disease characteristics and current treatment practices. At baseline, 300 adult AD patients with Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores (range, 0-4) of 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) whose treatments for AD were intensified, were assessed for clinical and patient-reported outcomes and current AD treatments. The registry patients' median age was 34.0 years; 60.7% were male and 71.7% had had AD for more than 20 years. At baseline, 220 study patients had an IGA score of 3 and 80 had an IGA score of 4. The median Eczema Area and Severity Index score was 21.7 (range, 0-72), the median body surface area involvement was 46.25%, and the median pruritus numerical rating scale score was 7.0 (range, 0-10); for each of these measures, higher scores represent greater severity. Most registry patients (86.7%) had recently used topical corticosteroids or topical calcineurin inhibitors as treatment for AD. This registry cohort represents a population of Japanese patients with moderate to severe AD and provides an important resource for characterizing the disease burden and evaluating the safety and effectiveness of various AD treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据