4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Thermosensitive nanocomposite gel for intra-tumoral two-photon photodynamic therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 99-109

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.01.019

关键词

Photodynamic therapy; Two-photon absorption; Hydrogel; Micelles; Deep penetration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81503009]
  2. National key research and development program of China [2017YFD0501404]
  3. Chongqing Science and Technology Commission [cstc2016jcyjA0550]
  4. Teaching Reform Project of Chongqing Postgraduate Education [yjg183039]
  5. 100 Talent Foreign program from the Anhui Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose here a new approach to achieve intratumoral near-infrared (NIR) two-photon photodynamic therapy (PDT). We established a composite micellar thermosensitive hydrogel made of clinically approved methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-polylactide copolymer (mPEG-PDLLA) and Pluronic (F127). The mPEG-PDLLA form micelles that can be loaded with two-photon absorption compound (T1) and photosensitizer (PS), The F127 micelles are liquid at room temperature and while forming an hydrogel at body temperature. This enables an in situ gelification upon injection providing long-term retentio within the tumor. The NIR light is thus upconverted into visible light by T1 and excited PS. The morphology, rheology properties and releasing profiles of hydrogel were fully characterized. The rheology properties and releasing mechanism was investigated. The composite hydrogel showed significant cytotoxicity to 4 T1 murine breast cancer cells upon NIR laser irradiation, while it showed non-significant cytotoxicity without. Time-dependent in vivo and ex vivo distribution results suggested that hydrogel administrated via intratumoral injection could prolong both PDT agents retention in tumor. We show here that the use of NIR radiation allows deep tissue penetration and inhibition of tumor growth of > 50% even under 1 cm thick muscle tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据