4.7 Article

The carbonation kinetics of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles: A Boundary Nucleation and Growth description

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 547, 期 -, 页码 370-381

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.089

关键词

Calcium hydroxide; Calcium carbonate; Nanoparticles; Carbonation; Kinetics; Boundary nucleation and growth

资金

  1. CSGI (Italian Centre for Colloid and Surface Science)
  2. NANORESTART project, Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [646063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothesis: The reaction of Ca(OH)(2) with CO2 to form CaCO3 (carbonation process) is of high interest for construction materials, environmental applications and art preservation. Here, the Boundary Nucleation and Growth model (BNGM) was adopted for the first time to consider the effect of the surface area of Ca (OH)(2) nanoparticles on the carbonation kinetics. Experiments: The carbonation of commercial and laboratory-prepared particles' dispersions was monitored by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, and the BNGM was used to analyze the data. The contributions of nucleation and growth of CaCO3 were evaluated separately. Findings: During carbonation the boundary regions of the Ca(OH)(2) particles are densely populated with CaCO3 nuclei, and transform early with subsequent thickening of slab-like regions centered on the original boundaries. A BNGM limiting case equation was thus used to fit the kinetics, where the transformation rate decreases exponentially with time. The carbonation rate constants, activation energies, and linear growth rate were calculated. Particles with larger size and lower surface area show a decrease of the rate at which the non-nucleated grains between the boundaries transform, and an increase of the ending time of Ca(OH)(2) transformation. The effect of temperature on the carbonation kinetics and on the CaCO3 polymorphs formation was evaluated. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据