4.7 Article

Tuning roughness features of thin film composite polyamide membranes for simultaneously enhanced permeability, selectivity and anti-fouling performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 540, 期 -, 页码 382-388

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.033

关键词

Roughness; TFC polyamide membrane; Permeability; Selectivity; Anti-fouling

资金

  1. Hong Kong Scholars Program [XJ2015015]
  2. General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [17207514]
  3. Seed Fund for Strategic Interdisciplinary Research Scheme at the University of Hong Kong
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21406060]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WA1514305]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M601527]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes set the golden standard for reverse osmosis technology, but tuning their permeability and selectivity remains a major challenge because of the inherent permeability-selectivity trade-off. Creating nano-sized voids within the polyamide rejection layer can tune the membrane roughness and increase its effective filtration area to improve the water permeability. Here we prepare nano-foamed polyamide rejection layers by adding sodium bicarbonate into the aqueous solution of amine monomers. We show a systematic evolution of the roughness structure of polyamide membranes, with increasingly leaf-like and belt-like features appearing under enhanced nano-foaming conditions. These nano-foamed features can result in remarkable improvements in both water permeability and salt rejection and reduce membrane fouling propensity at the same time. Our study paves a new research direction for designing future generation of desalination membranes, which holds vast potential to reduce the cost and energy consumption of desalination while achieving improved product water quality. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据