4.7 Article

Mechanochemical robust, magnetic-driven, superhydrophobic 3D porous materials for contaminated oil recovery

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 538, 期 -, 页码 25-33

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.066

关键词

Superhydrophobic; 3D porous materials; Eco-friendly; Ultralow-cost; Magnetic-driven

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China from China
  2. Key laboratory of Micro -systems and Microstructures Manufacturing of Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology from China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothesis: Research on the fabrication of superwettable adsorbents based on 3D porous materials has been attracting considerable attention due to the large storage space presented in their inner bodies. However, it is rare to present a facile, eco-friendly and ultralow-cost approach to modify the 3D porous materials with magnetism thereby obtaining a remotely controllable superhydrophobic/superoleophilic material. Experiments: Based on this, the 3D magnetic superhydrophobic porous materials (MSPM) based on adsorbent cotton and sponge as substrates were fabricated by a simple dip-coating method using nonhazardous chemical reagents as raw materials. Changes in pristine materials' wettability during the fabrication process were illustrated gradually by SEM micrographs and XPS characterization. Findings: The prepared 3D MSPM exhibits fast magnetic responsivity while the superwettable property of water contact angle reached to 162 degrees and demonstrated oil/water separation and demulsification with excellent adsorption capacity, high separation efficiency and good reusability. Moreover, the 3D MSPM maintains the superhydrophobicity even if compressed with 50% strain for 200 cycles, or immersed in a harsh chemical environment for more than 3 days. As a result, all these features make the as prepared 3D MSPM possess a large range of applications in contaminated oil recovery. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据