4.7 Article

Sandwich layering in binary nanoparticle films and effect of size ratio on stratification behavior

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 538, 期 -, 页码 209-217

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.084

关键词

Film formation; Evaporative assembly; Drying; Stratification; Colloidal films

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1335787]
  2. Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN) fellowship [P200A160163]
  3. DOE Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothesis: Stratification or self-segregation of multicomponent particle mixtures during drying is an important phenomenon to understand for the development of single-step deposition processes for complex coatings. We hypothesize that varying the ratio of particle Peclet numbers will lead to different types of stratification behavior. Experiments: Binary colloidal films of polystyrene and silica were prepared by evaporative film formation, and stratification of nanoparticles of different size ratio (7.7-1.2) was studied using microbeam small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Findings: SAXS spectra showed noticeable variations at different film depths, consistent with stratification. These results are quantified to obtain vertical composition profiles. We observe sandwich-type layered structures at different nanoparticle size ratios, which to our knowledge have not been previously observed experimentally or predicted by theory. For example, for films of larger particle size ratios (7.7-4.8), large particles are enriched at the film top and bottom, leading to a large-small-large or LSL behavior: while within films of smaller particle size ratio (2.2-1.2), small particles are enriched at the top and bottom of the film (small-large-small or SLS structures). The enrichment of particles at the top persists over several hundred particle layers and is not just a single monolayer pinned to the upper surface. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据