4.7 Article

Efficient removal of heavy metal ions and organic dyes with cucurbit [8] uril-functionalized chitosan

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 539, 期 -, 页码 400-413

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.078

关键词

Cucurbit [8] uril; Chitosan; Graft; Dyes; Pb(II) ion; Adsorption

资金

  1. Foundation of Hubei Provincial Education Department [D20131605]
  2. Discipline Innovation Team Project of Wuhan Textile University [201401020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a high-efficiency adsorption material is important for the simultaneous elimination of heavy metal ions and organic pollutants from wastewater. In the present work, a novel material was synthesized by grafting functionalized cucurbit [8] uril (CB[8]) onto chitosan (CS) chains via a C-N-C covalent bond (CB[8]-CS). This as-prepared material presented an unprecedented adsorption capacity. The maximum adsorption capacities (q(m)) were 1622.7 mg/g, 1172.7 mg/g, 1361.9 mg/g and 873.6 mg/g for the adsorption of reactive orange 5 (RO5), acidic blue 25 (AB25), reactive yellow 145 (RY145) and Pb2+ ions, respectively, which are far higher than the reported data. The simultaneous co-adsorption of dye and a heavy metal ion was tested with a mixed solution of 200 mg/L RO5 dye and Pb2+ ion, and the removal rates were 97% and 70% for RO5 and Pb2+, respectively. The adsorption mechanism was explored by means of the IR spectrum and the UV-vis diffuse reflection spectrum (DRS) together with theoretical calculations. The adsorption of dyes was mainly driven by the strong interaction between dye molecules and the hydrophobic cavity of CB[8], and the Pb2+ adsorption was mainly driven by the coordination of Pb2+ with the carbonyl of the CB[8] port and the amino group of chitosan. The ultrahigh adsorption capacity allows the use of CB[8]-CS as potential adsorbent for the simultaneous removal of heavy metal ions and organic dyes from aqueous solution. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据