4.7 Article

Heavy metal redistribution mechanism assisted magnetic separation for highly-efficient removal of lead and cadmium from human blood

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 536, 期 -, 页码 563-574

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.095

关键词

Heavy metal redistribution; Heavy metal intoxication; Magnetic nano capture agent; Extracorporal magnetic separation; Blood purification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81760138]
  2. Hainan Department of Science and Technology of China [ZDYF2018104]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013DFA51290]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic nano capture agent (MNCA)-based magnetic separation is considered as a promising approach to rapidly isolate heavy metals from blood. Limited removal efficiency and potential biosafety risks are the major challenges for the clinical use of MNCA-based magnetic separation. Here, we report a highly-efficient MNCA-based magnetic separation of heavy metals from blood in continuous multi-stage adsorption mode. The interactions between MNCA and blood components (e.g. blood cells and plasma proteins) and the MNCA-induced cellular immune responses are studied in detail. The distribution and redistribution of heavy metals in blood are quantitatively analyzed. It demonstrates that concentration dependent redistribution can increase the contact between heavy metals and MNCA, leading to improvement on heavy metal removal efficiency. The removal performance is tested in batch mode and in continuous mode. Results show that 97.97% of Pb and 96.53% of Cd are removed from blood in 120 min using continuous multi-stage adsorption mode, and the residual concentrations of Pb and Cd in blood decrease from 400 mu g L-1 to 8.11 mu g L-1 and 13.84 mu g L-1, respectively. This study paves an effective way for heavy metal intoxication therapy by MNCA-based magnetic separation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据